How do you think about the flooding of bracket?

[Boris Wang]

"Mike Parker" <aldacron71 at yahoo.com> 
??????:e6tjo6$106v$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
> Unknown W. Brackets wrote:
>
> I've adopted a syntax where I only use the colon (:) form on protection 
> attributes inside class/struct definitions. Outside, at module scope, I 
> use brackets for for protection attributes. Other modifiers, such as 
> static, final, abstract, I use inline. Version statements and multi-line 
> debug statements all get brackets. extern statements get colons.
>
> It's a coding convention I've come to like. I would really hate to see the 
> colon syntax removed because I find it to be much more readable in class 
> definitions:
>
> class MyClass
> {
>    private
>    {
>       void myFunc();
>    }
> }
>
> With one function it's not so bad, just ugly. But with multiple methods, 
> the colon form is much clearer to me. And I really wouldln't like being 
> forced to put all of my protection attributes inline.
>
> This is all just a matter of taste. Having optional coding styles is nice, 
> I think. I understand where you're coming from, but there are many other 
> ways to make code difficult to read. As I see it, this ain't broke so 
> don't fix it.
>

First, I post the thread, because neighter i like what, nor don't like what.

Second,  please think this problem in  more complicated situation.