appeal again: discard the syntax of private:, public: static: private{}, public{}, static{}.
Boris Wang
nano.kago at hotmail.com
Sat Jun 24 03:39:54 PDT 2006
What you said is that, i can't has a good feeling about reading your
program, just because i has not such a editor?
In other words, you force the other readers to use the editor you use?
"Derek Parnell" <derek at psych.ward> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:op.tbml4bwn6b8z09 at ginger.vic.bigpond.net.au...
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 10:22:00 +1000, Boris Wang <nano.kago at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> And this is what ?
>>
>>>
>>> // six pages
>>> ...
>>>
>>> int func3(...)
>>> {
>>> }
>>> int func4(...)
>>> {
>>> }
>>> int func5(...)
>>> {
>>> }
>>> int func6(...)
>>> {
>>> }
>>> int func7(...)
>>> {
>>> }
>>> a_type var2;
>>> }
>>> int func2(...)
>>> {
>>> }
>>> a_type var4;
>>> int func5(...)
>>> {
>>> }
>>> }
>
> Excellent, that is what it is. To find out whether it is
> public/private/static/version/debug effected, place your cursor on the
> final "}" and press ctrl-[ to jump to the matching brace. This assumes you
> are using Crimson Editor of course ;-)
>
> The point is, writing organised and predicatable code is less costly in
> the long run. We also have access to tools (i.e good editors) that can
> help us.
>
> --
> Derek Parnell
> Melbourne, Australia
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list