Thoughts about modules

[Kirk McDonald]

Derek Parnell wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:09:42 -0700, Kirk McDonald wrote:
> 
>>I don't feel this is a really serious issue. :-) "private import" 
>>provides all the sandboxing I think is needed in the absence of C++ 
>>namespaces. This is just an orginizational nicety.
> 
> 
> If only it worked though. "private import" is not conforming to the
> specifications.
> 

Okay, "private import" /would/ provide all the sandboxing needed, if it 
worked. :-)