static and protection
Jarrett Billingsley
kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 1 12:17:35 PST 2006
"Hasan Aljudy" <hasan.aljudy at gmail.com> wrote in message
news:du4ulf$1hpp$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>> This protection stuff is rediculous, any modern OO language needs to
>> handle these things well.
>
> Yeah, and the implicit module friendship is rediculous too!!! The whole
> C++ friend concept is rediclous.
Actually, nothing is "rediculous," only "r_i_diculous" ;)
Implicit module friendship works well. Do you have a better suggestion?
And the problem that the OP posted is most likely related to the "protection
attributes mean nothing if you use a fully qualified name" bug.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list