static and protection

Jarrett Billingsley kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 1 12:17:35 PST 2006


"Hasan Aljudy" <hasan.aljudy at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:du4ulf$1hpp$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>> This protection stuff is rediculous, any modern OO language needs to 
>> handle these things well.
>
> Yeah, and the implicit module friendship is rediculous too!!! The whole 
> C++ friend concept is rediclous.

Actually, nothing is "rediculous," only "r_i_diculous" ;)

Implicit module friendship works well.  Do you have a better suggestion?

And the problem that the OP posted is most likely related to the "protection 
attributes mean nothing if you use a fully qualified name" bug. 





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list