static and protection

John C johnch_atms at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 2 00:49:35 PST 2006


"Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:du4vft$1isn$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>
> And the problem that the OP posted is most likely related to the 
> "protection attributes mean nothing if you use a fully qualified name" 
> bug.

You might be right about it being a bug - 'protected' and 'package' are 
ignored on static class methods too. 





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list