What is NEEDED by 1.0??

[John Demme]

BCS wrote:
Full debugging information.

~John Demme


> I'm looking for a list of things that are needed by 1.0
> 
> I'm not looking for a wish list, or a "things I would like" list. I'm
> talking about the "Walter should be sent to the nut house if he go's 1.0
> without this" list.
> 
> here's my start (add/remove at as you see fit):
> 
> the language it's self
> --Implicit templates
> --protection attributes (by general consensus(?) these can use some work.)
> --any ambiguity that makes it imposable to find out it if code is valid(*)
> 
> 
> the compiler
> --all known major bugs (e.i. seg-v's on valid code, invalid code
> generation, ...) --array ops
> 
> both
> --sync DMD with the D spec, e.i. VERIFY that DMD is a fully compliant
> compiler (note: this will make sure that the spec is consistent and
> implantable)
> 
> 
> (*) things like
> http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D.bugs/5671 BTW
> this bug is also in DMC