Expand 'with'?

[BCS]

pragma wrote:
> Is there any particular reason why the 'with' statement is restricted to work
> with classes only?  I keep running into situations where using it with (all?)
> other D constructs, like structs, enums and such, would be quite useful; making
> it a sort of specialized 'alias' instead of something so limited.
> 
> - EricAnderton at yahoo

IIRC it does work with structs. I think I have used it.