No more implicit conversion real->complex?!

[Walter Bright]

"kris" <foo at bar.com> wrote in message news:4420640A.7020208 at bar.com...
> Even then, one might argue that "compatability" is actually there in name 
> only. Why would anyone convert a C program to D? I've yet to see an 
> extensive example of that; no doubt due to the extensive /incompatability/ 
> of D with .h files (in truth, I haven't seen any examples)

Take a look at std.md5, std.random, etc. For C++ to D, see std.regexp.