Today the Hobbyist, Tommorow, The World!

[charles]

> No offense to those running wiki4d, but it looks like an abandoned site
> from mid 1990s.

I totally agree, its not the content , its prowiki;  it sucks.  I know thats
offense to someone,  but compared with any other wiki it looks extremely
lackluster.

Its built on perl ?  Trash it.  I can host a new site if someone can move
over the content -- prowiki looks awful and is impossible to navigate.

( sorry for offending anyone. )

Charlie


"nick" <nick.atamas at gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e3952j$al5$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
> No offense to those running wiki4d, but it looks like an abandoned site
> from mid 1990s. Anything posted on that site might as well have a huge
> "don't pay attention to what I'm saying; this is out of date" label on it.
>
> It's unfortunate indeed, because there is some good info there; it just
> needs a visual update. Last I attempted something in that direction, I
> was overzealous and apparently offended the man behind wiki4d.
>
>
> Derek Parnell wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 May 2006 18:20:45 -0700, nick wrote:
> >
> >> There is a post like this one every several days.
> >>
> >> I think we need some sort of a notice on the digitalmars page that says
> >> "People who want to help polish/improve D follow this link...".
> >>
> >> The link would take you to a TODO list of things that need to happen
for
> >> D to become polished. That way we can channel the enthusiasm to
> >> something productive.
> >>
> >> Does such a  list already exist?
> >
> > I think one exists in the WIKI4D site, but if not, that is a good place
to
> > set one up.
> >
> >   http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi
> >