Today the Hobbyist, Tommorow, The World!
David Gileadi
foo at bar.com
Thu May 4 10:18:12 PDT 2006
Georg Wrede wrote:
> David Gileadi wrote:
>> nick wrote:
>> >> What we need is a dprogramming.com marketing site, with examples,
>> >> tutorials, a beginniner package, and flashy stuff.
>
> True.
>
>> > I will donate an existing layout or make a new one.
>
> From what the mockup looks like, you'd be a good choice for the job!
Thanks for the kind words! I'm a bit short on time right now--taking
three classes this summer and working full time--so that's why I posted
the unfinished version. However if there's interest I'll definitely
continue work on this.
>> Here's a mockup I've started, having been thinking much along the same
>> lines as Kyle. It's loosely based on www.mono-project.com Hopefully
>> it can help the discussion.
>>
>> http://img114.imageshack.us/my.php?image=mockup5ey.jpg (forgive the
>> imageshack hosting)
>
> It really looks nice! It kind of immediately invites you to pay a visit.
>
> Oh, and that particular style also (IMHO) reflects seriousness,
> dependability, real professionals behind it, and overall something that
> isn't dying away tomorrow.
>
>> Obviously the front page needs a lot more content. I was thinking
>> that the "What is D?" section should have links to the following:
>>
>> - Comparison
>> - Examples
>> - FAQ
>> - Docs
>> - License
>>
>> I also think there should be a small section before or after giving a
>> quick explanation of what D is, why I should use it, maybe what
>> platforms it works on, etc.
>>
>> The "What's New" section might contain the latest releases from the
>> changelog as well as any community announcements (maybe culled from
>> d.announce).
>
> Definitely!
>
> It's just imperative that the page contains something "new" or "fresh"
> each time you go see it. Stale pages are "so Eighties". ((I know the WWW
> was only invented in the nineties.))
>
>> Of course this would require someone to maintain the list :)
>>
>> Finally I beg Walter's forgiveness for modifying the DigitalMars logo.
>> I just think it looks better this way :)
>
> FWIW, I too think your version of the DM logo looks a lot better.
>
> It's also more balanced. And it puts fewer restraints on using it in
> different sizes tha the original, where the graphic quickly gets too
> small, or the word Mars too big. And it looks more like it's been
> designed by professionals. ((Sorry, Walter!))
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list