why scope(success)?

[Ben Hinkle]

>
> I'm considering using it for some code generation technqiues (parsers 
> mostly).
>
> Being able to declare what happens at the tail-end of a scope *first*, 
> rather
> than last, means that you have to maintain less state (across nested 
> scopes) in
> your code generator.
>
> - EricAnderton at yahoo

Ok. That sounds like an interesting application. If it comes on line 
sometime soon let me know.