version and debug statements
Anders F Björklund
afb at algonet.se
Thu May 11 13:35:25 PDT 2006
Brad Roberts wrote:
>>Having large parts of Posix be implementation dependent kinda shoots the whole
>>idea of a standard in the foot.
>
> I feel the need to cry foul here, a little. Which parts are
> implementation defined? How widely used are those parts? In my
> experience, the vast majority of the parts that are used with any major
> frequency are identical between the various posix compliant operating
> systems.
And say 10% varies and 90% is the same as the standard, isn't it better
then to "reuse" those parts that are the same and only conditionalize
the parts that actually differ ? Instead of copy/paste the whole thing ?
Even if it's 50-50, we're still talking 5 platforms (and it's growing!)
--anders
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list