version and debug statements

Ameer Armaly ameer_armaly at hotmail.com
Fri May 12 13:25:13 PDT 2006


"Derek Parnell" <derek at psych.ward> wrote in message 
news:op.s9cnlnwc6b8z09 at ginger...
> On Fri, 12 May 2006 23:41:09 +1000, Bruno Medeiros 
> <brunodomedeirosATgmail at SPAM.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On the other hand, it happens that here that the "each do a particular 
>> job well" has something to be said: there is much overlap in the jobs of 
>> both utils (the compiler and build), such in fact that I think their 
>> jobs are not that different.
>
> However, with the next release of Build the differences will be much more 
> pronounced. I've completed the coding for v3.0 of Build and I'm just 
> tidying up the docs this weekend. The main new feature, which btw makes it 
> diverge from DMD, is a macro processor. At this stage its only a text 
> replacement feature but in subsequent releases it will have a fully 
> functional macro processor included (which is already designed and 
> prototyped).
>
> Just as an example, it can now transform things such as
>   "for i = 1 to 100 do"
> to
>   "for(int i = 1; i <= 100; i++){"
>
Perhaps, but does this functionality really fall under the domain of a 
project management and automation program?
> -- 
> Derek Parnell
> Melbourne, Australia 





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list