version and debug statements
Ameer Armaly
ameer_armaly at hotmail.com
Fri May 12 13:25:13 PDT 2006
"Derek Parnell" <derek at psych.ward> wrote in message
news:op.s9cnlnwc6b8z09 at ginger...
> On Fri, 12 May 2006 23:41:09 +1000, Bruno Medeiros
> <brunodomedeirosATgmail at SPAM.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On the other hand, it happens that here that the "each do a particular
>> job well" has something to be said: there is much overlap in the jobs of
>> both utils (the compiler and build), such in fact that I think their
>> jobs are not that different.
>
> However, with the next release of Build the differences will be much more
> pronounced. I've completed the coding for v3.0 of Build and I'm just
> tidying up the docs this weekend. The main new feature, which btw makes it
> diverge from DMD, is a macro processor. At this stage its only a text
> replacement feature but in subsequent releases it will have a fully
> functional macro processor included (which is already designed and
> prototyped).
>
> Just as an example, it can now transform things such as
> "for i = 1 to 100 do"
> to
> "for(int i = 1; i <= 100; i++){"
>
Perhaps, but does this functionality really fall under the domain of a
project management and automation program?
> --
> Derek Parnell
> Melbourne, Australia
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list