Nonagon (Re: Accessing C++ code from D)

[Jarrett Billingsley]

"Kyle Furlong" <kylefurlong at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:e4dbp2$1brv$1 at digitaldaemon.com...

> Do you have plans to abstract away from DirectX?

Perhaps once I've become truly comfortable with DirectX ;)

Though the engine design itself is kind of.. automatically moving itself 
away from platform-dependence.  I'm not consciously doing it, but as I 
reorganize the engine, it just ends up that way.  For example, so far 
working on R5, I've abstracted mesh data and loading, I've abstracted some 
of the OS interfaces, and I've clearly delineated the two pipelines, so all 
the common code would be pretty much implementation-independent.  So, with 
maybe one more major release of nonagon (R6, one after the next), it might 
be abstracted enough that making a platform-independent version of it 
wouldn't be too hard.