Prime time???
Sean Kelly
sean at f4.ca
Fri Nov 3 16:39:24 PST 2006
Gregor Richards wrote:
>
> In my opinion, if D branched into D 1.0 (stable) and D 2.0 (unstable), a
> large enough chunk of people would continue to use the unstable branch
> that everybody else would be snowballed in by dependencies et cetera.
> Net accomplishment: Nothing.
hehe, you're probably right. My only issue is that I don't want the
introduction of new features to break existing functionality. So long
as that's a pretty reasonable guarantee, I'm all for a single unified
compiler release.
Sean
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list