Cases where I miss C++ 'using'

[Bill Baxter]

Daniel Keep wrote:
> 
> 
> Maybe if we allowed the prefix to be omitted when
> 
> a. we're switching on an enum,
> b. we're passing an enum argument to a function and
> c. when we're assigning to an enum typed variable
> 
> that would be enough.  Then again, maybe that's just because I'm a lazy
> bugger :)

Another case would be comparing equality like

   SomeEnum val;
   ...
   if (val == SomeEnum.Bar) { ... }

Or any of the other operators defined for Enums probably - !=, |, &, etc.

--bb