What is the state of === and !is as of D0.174

[Chris Nicholson-Sauls]

Pierre Rouleau wrote:
> Justin C Calvarese wrote:
> 
>> Pierre Rouleau wrote:
>>
>>> Now that D.0174 no longer allows '===' and '!==' operator 
>>> (http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html#new0174), what replaces 
>>> '!=='?  Is it '!is' ?  Is '!in' allowed?
>>>
>>> BTW, the lexical page (http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html) still 
>>> lists '===' and '!==' in the list of tokens.
>>
>>
>> What's New for D 0.126
>> Jun 7, 2005
>>
>> === now deprecated, replaced with is
>> !== now deprecated, replaced with !is
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog1.html#new0126
>>
>>
> Thanks, should have looked in 'older versions' link...
> 
> So this also means that   '!in'   never made it?
> 
> -- 
> 
> P.R.

No, it didn't... but I'm also not sure how it ought to work, or even be strictly 
neccessary, as the standard behavior of opIn is to return a pointer.  Simply checking the 
result of opIn against null is the same.  Yes, yes, so its one more operator... all well.

-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls