structs and opAssign -- why not?
Stewart Gordon
smjg_1998 at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 19 16:18:14 PST 2006
Bill Baxter wrote:
<snip>
> Basically "it bugs me, and there's no compelling use case".
> I think RAII is a compelling use case. Expression templates are another
> thing that has been talked about.
>
> At the very least I think D needs to have some sort of reasonable
> solution for smart pointers. Fleshing out structs seems one reasonable
> way to go about it.
<snip>
To bypass the restriction that scope object references cannot be
changed? If we're going to add something to the language for this, why
not just remove the restriction?
Stewart.
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M d- s:-@ C++@ a->--- UB@ P+ L E@ W++@ N+++ o K-@ w++@ O? M V? PS-
PE- Y? PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++++ h-- r-- !y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on
the 'group where everyone may benefit.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list