OSNews article about C++09 degenerates into C++ vs. D discussion

[Walter Bright]

Bill Baxter wrote:
> Indeed.  The people who really need to be GC-free are a tiny minority. 
> Wasting a lot of manpower creating a non-GC library just people who 
> don't want to convert from C++ will have one less justification for not 
> using D sees like a huge waste of effort to me.

I translated Empire from C to D. It worked fine, and did not use the gc 
at all. It didn't require a new runtime library.