Better syntax for varargs / variadic functions?

[Chris Miller]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 04:41:38 -0400, Bill Baxter  
<dnewsgroup at billbaxter.com> wrote:

> Much better!
>
> It seems very odd, though, that the opApply doesn't do the advancing of  
> arg (the iw++ that next() does).   If opApply took care of that, then  
> get() or value() would probably be a better name than next().

Because a lot of times some arguments mean "look at next argument too" so  
you'd only need to call next() again and it wouldn't goof up the  
iteration; you could also even foreach() over the same args for a sub  
range: foreach(arg; args){ foreach(arg; args){ if(foo)break; } }.