Lisp vs. C++ (not off-topic)
Lionello Lunesu
lio at lunesu.remove.com
Wed Oct 11 02:15:05 PDT 2006
Walter Bright wrote:
> Josh Stern wrote:
>> This old blog doesn't mention D, but I think it is good and really
>> relevant anyway:
>>
>> http://userpages.umbc.edu/~bcorfm1/C++-vs-Lisp.html
>>
>> IMO, it points to a set of issues that relate to how D (and its
>> libraries)
>> have the potential to allow developers to be a lot more productive than
>> they are with C++. Particularly relevant D features related to
>> the points mentioned there include but are not limited to GC, mixins,
>> regex, and elimination of header/instantiation separation. The point
>> about the productivity benefits of creating interfaces that return the
>> most interesting value (maybe alongside the interface that allows the
>> greatest efficiency when optimizing) is a good one to remember in
>> practice.
>
>
> It is a very interesting article for anyone wanting to carefully look at
> language differences. Anyone care to try a D version following the
> original challenge?
>
> http://www.flownet.com/ron/papers/lisp-java/
It was sooo easy in D! I got it done in 1 hour 15 minutes.. But, my
results differ from theirs and I can't figure out why.
For example, my prog comes up with "3-/0--69-4: 3 echt", which seems
correct ("echt" is in the dictionary and is coded as "0694"), but their
output.txt has nothing for the phone number "3-/0--69-4" ???
L.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list