Why there are no 'physical' object variables (only references)?

[BCS]

Sean Kelly wrote:
> Kristian wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hmm, what if structures could have interfaces and 
>> constructors/destructors... and what the heck, inheritance too? 
>> Hehheh, this way we would have 'physical classes' for local use and 
>> 'reference classes' for global use.
> 
> 
> It will never happen :-)  Though ctor support would be nice, at the very 
> least.  That would simplify initialization and eliminate the need for 
> the static opCall trick.
> 
> 
> Sean

There is no technical reason struct (or anything that can produce a 
delegate) can't do interfaces. Inheritance on the other hand... I hope 
that never happens.