Proposal for a standard for D library naming

[Anders F Björklund]

Sean Kelly wrote:

> For D import files I settled on using /usr/import instead of 
> /usr/include.  It seemed to provide a cleaner separation than sticking 
> C/C++/D files all in the same tree.

Sure, but /usr/import is not in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS).

And I don't really have a problem with combining C/C++/D together. But
if it is ever important, "import" can be a symlink over to "include/d".

--anders