size_t, size_t, wherefore art thou aliased?
Frank Benoit
keinfarbton at nospam.xyz
Sat Sep 23 11:15:42 PDT 2006
Hasan Aljudy schrieb:
> I think I don't really understand the issue, but I'm gonna throw in my 2
> cents anyway ... even though it might sound pretty stupid:
>
> Wouldn't a versioned alias declaration solve this?
>
> version( X32 )
> {
> alias something ...
> }
> version( X64 )
> {
> alias something else ...
> }
>
I think this is exactly like size_t is defined. And the problem Gregor
describes is a result from that.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list