standardization of D

[David B. Held]

Peter C. Chapin wrote:
> [...]
> Ideally once 1.0 was released there should have been a fork in the 
> release schedule for D. Bug fixes to 1.0 could be provided separately 
> from language enhancements leading toward 2.0 (or whatever). That way 
> people interested in coding to the 1.0 "standard" could get a fixed 
> compiler without the "clutter" of new features.
> [...]

This is a pretty important point, and more people should complain about 
this.  It does dilute the utility of having a 1.0 release.

Dave