DMD needs branches
Tom S
h3r3tic at remove.mat.uni.torun.pl
Wed Apr 11 15:11:16 PDT 2007
Chris Miller wrote:
> I'm sure this was brought up in the past, but DMD definitely needs
> stable and unstable branches.
Agreed.
> -v1 doesn't cut it. My code is compiled with -v1 and still breaks with
> new DMD versions.
Same here.
> Each new DMD version is bug-ridden. This new one 1.011 is pretty bad!
It's even worse than this in my case. With a few friends, I'm doing a
project for the Team Programming course at my univ. It's a First Person
Shooter, containing more than 55k lines of our own D code plus some 200k
of dependencies, such as DDL, Mango, Code Analyzer, Derelict, Enki,
MinTL and various bindings. And we're stuck with... DMD 0.175. I've
tried every single DMD release which came after 0.175, including 1.010b,
and each has its own problems. The old bugs get slowly fixed, but new
ones appear at a frightening pace. DMD 1.011 adds some more mixin issues
to the pile, and even with -v1, considers 'ref' a keyword.
The worst problems with the new DMDs are codegen issues. For instance,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1068
Earlier, 1.007 had a weird NRVO problem. It could return garbage from
functions when their calls appeared at the return statement. It seems to
be gone, but no one filled a bug report and I'm not sure if it's not
just lurking someplace else.
My team and me have first got stuck with DMD 0.175 when 0.176 changed
the ABI and DDL stopped working for us. But then I updated DDL to the
ABI of DMD 1.0. I can't even test it because bugs have appeared over the
time. Some made Mango not compile, thus sending DDL to bite the dust as
well. The latest and best one is the invalid codegen issue from the link
above. I can't even make our game's GUI run because I'm getting random
access violations.
After updating to DMD 1.011, I had some errors telling me about it not
being able to find identifiers that certainly were there. Yet Another
Mixin Bug.
D really needs to get stable before anything serious can be made in
it... Not that I don't like the new features. The CTFE, mixins and
smarter IFTI are just great... If only I could use them. Our project
contains numerous workarounds for the issues in DMD 0.175 because we
can't just report a bug and hope we'll be able to continue with the next
DMD release. We're stuck with 0.175 and we've been stuck with it for the
last 5 months.
I'm a huge fan of D and a long-time user, but I simply don't know what
to tell people when they ask why we're using some archaic 0.175 version
and not the new one with all the spiffy features. Please, fix D.
--
Tomasz Stachowiak
http://h3.team0xf.com/
h3/h3r3tic on #D freenode
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list