D vs. placement new (for classes) aka why D needs .sizeof and

[David B. Held]

Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
> [...]
> Uhm... except that we have them already?  Or is this not what you meant:
> 
> #  interface IToString {
> #    public char[] toString () ;
> #  }
> #
> #  auto obj = new class IToString {
> #    public char[] toString () { return "<anonymous class>"; }
> #  };

Hmm...that's pretty cool.  I guess that is needed for Java 
compatibility, huh?

Dave