DMD needs branches

[Russell Lewis]

janderson wrote:
> Here's a crazy idea.  Why not have all big libraries in some mega test 
> suite.  You would only run this test on -v1 just before you release a 
> new version (because it would take so long with 100 odd projects).  At 
> the very least you could capture all the compile-time errors that way 
> (and possibly runtime too).

I think that dstress is pretty much what you're talking about; the 
current limitation, of course, is that it focuses on small testcases 
instead of larger libraries.  It seems like various libraries could be 
checked in (with unitests built-in) and this used as a good automated 
test suite.