The in operator and normal arrays

[Myron Alexander]

Bill Baxter wrote:
> I don't recall if I ever filed an enh request for it.  If you have time, 
> you could check and see, and then file one if you don't find it there 
> already.
> 
> --bb

Bill,

I was in the process of writing the enhancement request when I had a 
quick peek at the documentation. The operator overloading document 
specifically allows for overloading the in operator with opIn and opIn_r 
(although doesn't say how it is supposed to be used). This got me 
thinking, is this an enhancement request, or a bug fix request?

Regards,

Myron.