Two standard libraries?

[Robert Fraser]

> it would be so much better if one could use both tango and phobos, for some things procedural programing makes more sense, sometimes OO programing makes more sense, and theres nothing to keep these too situations isolated from each other, since a program only imports the modules it needs I don't see why both phobos and tango can be used simultanously.

Tangobos. I know that's not the point of it, but it works for that.

> 
> > I am not saying that Phobos is perfect.  It has lots of omissions, but I have a feeling that it is about at the right level to enable authors to write the more OO stuff on top of it.

While we _can_ write more OO stuff on top of Phobos, someone else (the Tango team) has already done & tested it. Why reinvent the wheel?