Overloading/Inheritance issue

[Frits van Bommel]

Regan Heath wrote:
> Steve Schveighoffer wrote:
>  > I was assuming that C++ got it right.  More than
>> I can't believe that C++ is not right, I'm surprised I never had
>> problems with it...
> 
> It's truly odd that no-one seems to have a problem with it in C++.  It's 
> not as if C++ even has 'alias' so it cannot pull symbols in, you're left 
> re-implementing in the derived class.  Perhaps everyone just does that 
> without thinking about it.

C++ has "using Base::method;" to replace alias for this particular case.