a more consistent const syntax

[Reiner Pope]

Walter Bright wrote:
> I realize there are some consistency issues with the current syntax for 
> const, but it is more complicated than expected. Your idea to separate 
> out compile time constants with a new keyword is a good one, and is 
> similar to one Andrei came up with (using alias).

If anyone is interested, there was a brief discussion on this in the D 
Const Design Rationale thread here:

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/D_const_design_rationale_54725.html#N54844

Interestingly, the use of both 'define' and 'alias' were suggested (as 
well as a 'literal' keyword), so it seems like those two might be quite 
intuitive syntaxes.

   -- Reiner