Hijacking

[Sean Kelly]

BCS wrote:
> Reply to Walter,
> 
>> Derek Parnell wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 11:47:18 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>
>>>> I want to continue a bit in the Overloading/Inheritance thread which
>>>> is getting a little long, on a closely related issue which I find to
>>>> be important, but so rarely referred to that I had to come up with a
>>>> name for it - hijacking.
>>>>
>>> I'm just wondering what the NSA is making of this discussion :)
>>>
>> Hopefully, they'll analyze the site, get excited about D, and use D
>> for their next generation software!
> 
> Fat chance, most of D's advantages don't exist in under ~5000 LOC and 
> anything over that and the NSA won't touch it. Besides there isn't 20+ 
> years of best practices in how to right secure software in D (as this is 
> in C)

I'd think DBC would be a perk, if nothing else.  Assuming the NSA 
currently uses C, that is.


Sean