Overloading/Inheritance issue

[Bill Baxter]

Walter Bright wrote:
> James Dennett wrote:
>> This might not sit well with those who think that virtual is
>> a good default though.  I'm not one of them; I've never seen
>> problems caused by non-virtual as default,
> 
> I, for one, have had several severe and very hard to find bugs caused by 
> non-virtual as the default. It's something that defies visual inspection 
> looking for them.

Is there some way currently to force methods to be non-virtual?  Does 
'final' do that?

--bb