Stroustrup's talk on C++0x

[anonymous]

eao197 Wrote:

[...]
> BTW, there is a C++0x overview in Wikipedia:  
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x
> 
> It is iteresting to know which advantages will have D (2.0? 3.0? 4.0?)  
> over C++0x? May be only high speed compilation and GC.
First of all, thanks for the link. To me as a non-professional
programmer, D is much clearer and cleaner structured. Coming from
Pascal/Delphi, it is far easier to understand. It also has a bit the air
of perl: There is more than one way to do it. In C++, there seems to be only
one right way, but that is hard to understand.