const again

[guslay]

Walter Bright Wrote:
> 
> Yes for that reason, and the other reason is one rarely wants storage 
> allocated for manifest constants. windows.d has 10,000 declarations in 
> it, who wants 40K of executable bloat from const declarations?
> 

const int x = 1;

Doesn't x get substituted by 1 everywhere in a constant propagation pass?
I thought it didn't take storage, at least in optimization mode.