const again

[Walter Bright]

Sean Kelly wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> Ary Borenszweig wrote:
>>> Why not
>>>
>>> macro x = 3;
>>> ?
>>
>> It's been suggested several times. It doesn't make much aesthetic 
>> sense to do things like:
>>
>>     macro int x = 3;
> 
> So are you saying that it would be fine without the type qualifier, or 
> that you don't like the use of "macro" here at all?

Since the optional type qualifier should be supported, it doesn't make 
sense.