Any word on the return-type const syntax?

Janice Caron caron800 at googlemail.com
Sun Dec 9 00:40:46 PST 2007


On 12/9/07, Robert Fraser <fraserofthenight at gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed, I really like this idea.

Also, you wouldn't really have to invent a new keyword! Neither
"constness" nor "constancy" is needed, because we could instead maybe
do (const : K) or something. Maybe even (const K) would work?



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list