How about 'pure' for constants?

Daniel Keep daniel.keep.lists at gmail.com
Tue Dec 11 04:31:12 PST 2007


This is by far the best suggestion thus far.  This way, there's no
confusion over what it does based on existing behaviour, we can define
exactly how it should behave, and it's logically consistent with pure
functions.

Nicely done :)

	-- Daniel



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list