Proposal: static template(fail)

[Robert DaSilva]

Bruce Adams wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:53:23 -0000, Janice Caron
> <caron800 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/13/07, Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup at billbaxter.com> wrote:
>>> If the template results in a something that's
>>> an ordinary syntax error then it's just a substitution failure.  "static
>>> assert" is special in that it short circuits that behavior.
>>
>> Really? Wow! I'm going to have to try that now!
> 
> So did it work?
> I guess you are using the Unix silence is golden principle.

I've tried it and it didn't work for me.