Proposal: static template(fail)

[Bill Baxter]

Robert DaSilva wrote:
> Bruce Adams wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:53:23 -0000, Janice Caron
>> <caron800 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/13/07, Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup at billbaxter.com> wrote:
>>>> If the template results in a something that's
>>>> an ordinary syntax error then it's just a substitution failure.  "static
>>>> assert" is special in that it short circuits that behavior.
>>> Really? Wow! I'm going to have to try that now!
>> So did it work?
>> I guess you are using the Unix silence is golden principle.
> 
> I've tried it and it didn't work for me.

Why be so cryptic?  Show us what you tried for goodness sake.

--bb