Proposal: static template(fail)

[BCS]

Reply to Bruce,

> That is only the case if it is a programming style that is encouraged
> or
> frequently required. If it is for something that occurs rarely and is
> discouraged only bad programs will be tangled and bad programs will
> always
> be tangled. Is it really likely to occur often?


> and is there a better
> solution
> or workaround?

take that last bit out of context and you have just stated my concern. Before 
template(fail) is added it's implications and alternatives should be considered. 
Is there some way to make it would neatly and consistently without adding 
a huge cost? I'm just stating concerns, not saying it's a bad idea.