Associative Array Initalizers - Possible Syntax?
renoX
renosky at free.fr
Tue Feb 13 14:13:11 PST 2007
cracki a écrit :
> Kirk McDonald Wrote:
>> I do not find this a compelling reason to require brackets or
>> parentheses in all cases. I do like Nicolai's suggestion, though.
>> (It's very much like Python's syntax, and I believe has been
>> suggested before.)
>
>
> I agree. Requiring brackets makes not much sense. This is not lisp.
> We have operator precedence and we can make use of it. And if that
> fails, use parens. No big deal.
>
> I also prefer the "[...]" style to the python/ruby/JSON "{...}"
> style. It's consistent with nromal array literals and spares the
> curlies from getting overloaded yet another time.
Agreed, if ':' conflicts too much with '? :' (and I don't think it does,
parenthesis are here to avoid the problem) then let's use '->' or ':>'
instead of ':', not a big deal.
Otherwise don't use any special syntax, after all, an associative array
is a just list of key,value pair so
int tab[char[]] = [["key", 10], ["key2", 11]];
But I really dislike the idea of separating keys and values, sure
sometimes this is terser but it's also much more likely to induce hard
to find errors.
renoX
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list