status of 'lazy' ?

[kris]

David Medlock wrote:
> kris wrote:
> 
>> So yeah, with the talk about 'lazy' being /adjusted/ ... how will it 
>> change? Will the syntax remain as is, or what?
>>
>> Thx
> 
> 
> Why does it need adjustment?
> 
> I was just getting used to it...
> 
> -David


Seems like Andrei made some fairly scathing remarks about it, a while 
back? IIRC, there was some implication somewhere that it would change?

Also, how do you propogate/proxy a lazy arg? Looking at the generated 
code, it seems the proxy itself becomes lazy too ... that seems like a bug?

I'm asking because there's a good use-case requiring attention ...