Restrict Class Properties?

[Serg Kovrov]

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> True properties would be understood by the compiler as a distinct construct, 
> rather than a hackish rewrite of assignment into a call.  This would allow, 
> among other things, for templated properties; properties as the destination 
> of op=, ++, and --; and the abolishment of the '&' when getting the address 
> of a function or delegate.  As well as preventing such foolishness as 
> "writefln = 6;". 

Yes, exactly.

-- 
serg.