Lib change leads to larger executables
Sean Kelly
sean at f4.ca
Thu Feb 22 12:08:46 PST 2007
Kristian Kilpi wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:32:18 +0200, Frits van Bommel
> <fvbommel at REMwOVExCAPSs.nl> wrote:
>
>> Sean Kelly wrote:
>>> Ideally, perhaps a linker could provide both options: link fast and
>>> potentially bloat the exe or link carefully (and slowly) for a lean
>>> exe. I'd use the fast link for debugging and the slow link for
>>> releases. Assuming, of course, that the linker were reliable enough
>>> that there was no risk of changing app behavior between the two.
>>
>> That might not be the case here: if a module's object file is pulled
>> in, that module's static constructors and destructors are called at
>> runtime, right? So if different modules are pulled in with those
>> options, different static constructors/destructors get called.
>> (Same goes for unit tests, if enabled, by the way)
>
> Hmm, yes, but how that's different from the today's situation? Currently
> the linker chooses *arbitrary* object modules that happen to contain the
> needed typeinfo.
Because as long as the list of dependencies remains unchanged, the same
arbitrary choices should be made.
Sean
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list