aliasing base methods

[Johan Granberg]

Frank Benoit (keinfarbton) wrote:

> 
> My point is, i want this strange rules to be removed.
> And I want the override keyword not to be a useless thing.
> 
> I propose:
> 1.) make an overload not hide base implementations

votes++

> 2.) make the override keyword required, to make it useful.

Not so sure about this one. It will introduce a lot of unnecessary typing
and that can be annoying if you want the function prototypes to fit into 80
characters. 

> 3.) remove the interface reimplementation rule.

Definitely a good idea.

> 
> What do you think?