supporting DMD-1.016 and DMD-2.000 with the same source code
torhu
fake at address.dude
Sun Jul 1 05:43:46 PDT 2007
Thomas Kuehne wrote:
> 6) C-strings
> ============
>
> Sometime I have to interface with C libries this "const char*" is
> required:
>
> # static if(1 < dmd_version){
> # mixin("alias const(char)* stringz;");
> # }else{
> # alias char* stringz;
> # }
>
> The mixin in required because the content has to be syntactically
> correct and "const(char)" isn't a valid DMD-1 construct.
Is there any reason not to use 'in' instead? stringz looks a bit alien
in C prototypes.
Phobos does just that, so I suppose it's okay:
char* strcpy(char* s1, in char* s2);
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list