pseudo array properties

[Charlie]

 > Personally, I'd like to see it generalized to more than just arrays...

Yes me too.  I guess we now have to convice Andrei , who will in turn 
convince Walter, since Walter has been ignoring our pleads lately.

Jason House wrote:
> Charlie wrote:
>> That will be a serious loss.  This 'feature' was an awesome one, and a 
>> shame it never made it into the specs.
> 
> Personally, I'd like to see it generalized to more than just arrays...
> 
> 
>>
>> Derek Parnell wrote:
>>> In V2, were we meant to lose the (undocumented) facility to have pseudo
>>> properties for arrays?
>>>
>>> In other words, the code below compiled and ran for V1 but it doesn't 
>>> for
>>> V2.
>>>
>>> char[] foo(char[] a) { return a; }
>>> void main()
>>> {
>>>     char[] q;
>>>     q = q.foo;  // Invoke 'foo' as if it were a property.
>>> }
>>>
>>>