Phobos licensing
Ant
duitoolkit at yahoo.ca
Fri Jun 1 20:45:44 PDT 2007
Bill Baxter wrote:
> Phobos' std.loader contains this language in the source file:
>
> * (ii) Any derived versions of this software (howsoever modified)
> * remain the sole property of Synesis Software.
>
> It doesn't define 'derived' so I suspect this could be interpreted quite
> broadly by the courts, particularly given the "howsoever modified" bit
> which seems to be saying "if you were thinking of interpreting 'derived'
> narrowly -- DON'T."
>
> I don't think draconian licensing terms like these belong in the
> standard library. I suggest we ask Synesis for more liberal licensing
> terms or else remove the file from Phobos until it can be reimplemented.
>
> --bb
I asked that question 3 years, 1 months and 3 days ago.
I moved to tango now.
Ant
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list